Something about the Union Jack T-shirt made me want to do a Bond and Bond girl pose…but Monster High dolls do not really want to do this pose. I just could not get Scarah’s head to stay down on Toralei’s shoulder. 😦
This is one of those rare photos that I’m actually kinda proud of. I don’t usually have much luck posing dolls the way I want to, so it’s amazing to me that this one worked out this well.
Because of the furry arm things, you can’t really tell in the photo, but Clawdeen has her arms around Frankie, and they’re holding hands in front of Frankie’s stomach:
So I’ve been meaning to get to this post for a while, and I managed to get the photos taken before I started working on the photos for June. (I’ll explain in my first June post as to why I have a special theme for the month.) It’s not that I want to show off my She-Ra collection, it’s that I’ve got two big purchases I want to squee about. 🙂
And here’s the first one:
Sadly, there’s only one half of the front door (and it doesn’t actually stay in place, due to broken hinges) and only one window pane, but still! She-Ra’s Crystal Castle! 😀
And it has pretty much all its interior accessories:
(Though from looking at a list I found online, it turns out the purple fur thing I put on the bed as a comforter is supposed to be a rug. Oops. 😛 )
I had hoped that week three of the April Alternative Challenge could be Princess Elizabeth. (Which would have been especially appropriate today, since it’s the Queen’s birthday.) Alas, she’s still at the dolly hospital. 😦 And if I’d had more time, I could have put up a really freakin’ awesome Princess of Power post (it will be coming eventually, I hope) but I have two major projects due on Monday, so I’ve been freaking out trying to get them done. (And they still aren’t done, either. I have to go back to the library on Sunday (skipping work!) and possibly on Monday, too.)
So this post is sort of slap-dash. For which I apologize.
Anyway, so maybe you’ve seen the tiny, ragdoll-like Monster High Minis in stores, if you frequent the Monster High aisle. (I know many don’t, especially since the reboot.) They’re about as tall as the distance from the knuckle of my thumb to the tip (wow, that’s a precise measurement!) and super-cute, but Mattel’s sort of tricksy about them: they sell some in sets where you can see what you’re getting, and the rest in blind boxes. The visible sets get you hooked on the cuteness, and include little fliers to show you all the other ones you’re missing out on, and then you end up buying the blind box ones….and I’ve been kind of hooked on blind box figures lately anyway. (Though that’s another post entirely. 😛 )
So I was trying to resist the lure of getting anything other than the packaged sets. Then I was at Walmart looking for various stuff I didn’t find, and found an 8-figure set of Season 2 of the Monster High Minis (why do blind box figures get “Seasons” instead of something more normal?) and I just had to get it. Mainly for these two:
Pineapple Deuce. Pineapple. Deuce.
How could I resist?
There were some other really cool ones in the set, too:
These two were exclusive to the set. (Actually, I think the two fruity ones may have been, too…not that “fruity” is what they call them…) They’re also the only “gem” ghouls in the season.
So, a werewolf mermaid…is a weremaid? Merwolf? Yeah, I think I like that one…
Anyway, the background on the set had super-adorable illustrations of a strawberry Draculaura and a lemon Rochelle, so I found myself studying the little flier inside for the whole contents of Season 2, and there are so many of them that I just need, in that awful doll-collecting itchy way. (Or maybe Clawdeen’s fleas feared the ocean water and jumped onto me?)
And then I had a look at the flier for Season 1 out of one of the packaged sets, and found that it actually had some pretty cool stuff, especially the space ghouls:
Though, honestly, I didn’t get this Frankie from a blind box. I got her with the carrying case…
Most of those 28 minis came from sets of 3 (and the set of 8), but there have been a few blind box purchases, too…just enough that there’s actually one more mini than can fit in the case. (I’m hoping Season 2 when it gets fully released will have a different case, maybe with more room, a more transparent cover, and a new mini to go with it. But I’d settle for just a different mini…)
I guess this one’s supposed to be the new ghost, but to me she’s Spectra. Because they have the same color scheme and all. Anyway, she’s the odd one out, but she still has a home to live in, ’cause most of the blind box minis come in nice, interlocking lockers…
See? She’s got a nice flat in a small high-rise.
But it seemed a bit lonely this way…
…so I let some of my other blind box figs move in, at least for the time being. 😛
Well, I realize that’s not been much of a post, but I have to go make dinner and then finally get to work on my school work for the day. (I had to go to work today, so I didn’t have much time to work on my projects.)
Oh, I almost forgot! There’s a project on Kickstarter right now to start a Fashion Doll Museum. If anyone out there is interested, check it out — and pass it along to anyone else who might be interested, too!
Meet Patsy, my very first composition doll! 😀
Patsy dolls were made by Effanbee from 1928 to 1946 in a variety of sizes. I haven’t actually measured this one (and the seller mis-listed her as being 11 1/2 inches tall, which she totally is not) so I’m not 100% sure which type of Patsy she is, but she’s about 8 or 9 inches tall (by my haphazard guesswork) which would make her the Tinyette Toddler, Patsy Babyette or Patsyette. According to Doll Reference.com, her body should be marked “Effanbee Patsy Pats. Pend. Doll” or something similar, but her back has no markings. Which could mean she’s from 1946 — apparently in the final year she was unmarked — or that her torso is not original. She has definitely been re-strung — her limbs are all so tight that they can’t hold any position other than the one in the picture above — so it’s possible that her torso was replaced with one from another type of doll at that time. Or maybe she’s from 1946. Can’t say it matters, honestly. I bought her ’cause she’s adorable, not because I care about her “authenticity,” y’know? (Speaking of “authenticity,” her dress and bonnet may well be original, but those red bloomers absolutely are not. I need to replace them with white ones…) Continue reading
So, remember a while back I got the collector reproduction of Dream Date Barbie? Y’know, this one:
Well, I not long ago got the real thing:
Now, at first glance, you’re probably thinking that there’s no comparison, because the original looks awful. But keep in mind, she’s a doll who was obviously well loved, and she’s more than thirty years old. So we have to look past the thinning, messy hair, and the fact that I never could figure out the “right” way to arrange her dress over her shoulders. (It’s more of an attached shawl than a dress, per se.)
The bald spot is definitely a problem. No question about that. And the rest of her hair is rather fly-away and messy. But if I have a chance to calm her hair down, I can probably get it to hide the bald spot. More important, look at her face. Isn’t it delicate and sweet? I really like how subtle the Superstar-era face-ups often were. (Before the late ’80s when the Rockers aesthetic overpowered them. Though I’m fond of the Rockers-era stuff, too. One of my two favorites as a kid was one of the Rockers…)
By contrast, here’s the face on the reproduction. Cleaner, and the hair’s obviously still perfect, but the face looks soulless to me. Trading the purple eyes for blue ones was definitely not a good idea. (I apologize for the pictures of the reproduction in this post. I forgot I could remove the plastic screen in front of her…but I think they still show my point well enough despite the glare.)
The photo also shows you that her earring is a plain silver stud…or it kind of does, anyway. This one from the earlier post might make that a little more clear. Anyway, look at the earrings (and ring!) on the original:
Superstar-era jewelry was the best! 😀 I don’t know what these are supposed to look like (a diamond set in glass?) but I love them regardless.
The contrast that stands out the most, to me, is the difference in fabric. The original Dream Date has a richer color scheme, and a shimmery fabric, while the reproduction is a matte color that utterly fails when placed side by side with the original. (I loved it before I saw the two together and realized how pathetic the new one is in comparison.) I’ll give the reproduction lots of points for its sequins, though: they’re much better done than the original’s.
So, there you have it, the reproduction Dream Date and the original Dream Date.
This has been the first Unfair Comparison. The Unfair Comparison gallery is here.
(At least one more is currently planned. Though there I can only compare dresses, but…of course, first I have to take the freakin’ pictures…)
Aaaaanyway, having just done two Barbie posts in a row, I really need to do something non-Barbie next. 😛 I’ll see if I can get those Figma photos taken at my brother’s place on Monday, maybe. Or I could try my hand at changing Gen’s eyes to the new ones, or maybe giving him one of each and see how that looks. But overall it’s probably going to be a slow summer on this blog, ’cause it’s so freakin’ hot in my house that I really can’t get up the energy to take pictures. 😦
(Oh, speaking of Figma, I got charged by Good Smile recently, so one of the Figmas I pre-ordered is on the way from Japan now. I’d need to check the release dates to see which one, but I think it’s Tomoyo-chan, as I think Link’s a later release.)